翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Critics' Choice Television Award for Best Comedy Series ・ Critics' Choice Television Award for Best Drama Series ・ Critics' Choice Television Award for Best Guest Performer in a Comedy Series ・ Critics' Choice Television Award for Best Guest Performer in a Drama Series ・ Critics' Choice Television Award for Best Movie/Miniseries ・ Criticism of Esperanto ・ Criticism of ESPN ・ Criticism of evolutionary psychology ・ Criticism of Facebook ・ Criticism of Family Guy ・ Criticism of fast food ・ Criticism of Franklin D. Roosevelt ・ Criticism of Google ・ Criticism of government ・ Criticism of government response to Hurricane Katrina ・ Criticism of Greenpeace ・ Criticism of Hadith ・ Criticism of Haredi Judaism ・ Criticism of Hinduism ・ Criticism of Holocaust denial ・ Criticism of Human Rights Watch ・ Criticism of intellectual property in the United Kingdom ・ Criticism of Islam ・ Criticism of Islamism ・ Criticism of Jainism ・ Criticism of Java ・ Criticism of Jehovah's Witnesses ・ Criticism of Jesus ・ Criticism of Judaism ・ Criticism of libertarianism Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Criticism of Greenpeace ： ウィキペディア英語版 Criticism of Greenpeace Throughout its history, the policies and objectives of the non-governmental environmental protection and conservation organization Greenpeace have been criticized by a number of groups, including national governments, members of industry, former Greenpeace members, scientists, and political groups. The organization's methods, such as the use of direct action, have also led to controversy and legal action. ==Prominent critics== Canadian ecologist Patrick Moore, a former Greenpeace founding member, is a critic of the organization. In addition, Patrick Moore had once spoken out against nuclear power in 1976,〔Patrick Moore, ''Assault on Future Generations'', Greenpeace report, p47-49, 1976 - pdf ()〕 but today he supports it, along with renewable energy sources.〔''Washington Post'' Article, Sunday, April 16, 2006 - ''Going Nuclear'' ()〕〔''The Independent'', ''Nuclear energy? Yes please!'' ()〕 In Australian newspaper ''The Age'', he writes "Greenpeace is wrong — we must consider nuclear power".〔''The Age'' ''Greenpeace is wrong — we must consider nuclear power'', article by Patrick Moore,December 10, 2007 ()〕 He argues that any realistic plan to reduce reliance on fossil fuels or greenhouse gas emissions need increased use of nuclear energy.〔 Phil Radford, Executive Director of Greenpeace US responded that nuclear energy is too risky and takes too long to build to address climate change. Radford asserts that the U.S. can shift to nearly 100% renewable energy while phasing out nuclear power by 2050.〔〔 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Criticism of Greenpeace」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.